Chemical Safety Science, 2018, Volume 2, No 2, p. 351 — 364


Expert analysis approach


UDC 338.23                                                                           Download PDF (RUS)

DOI: 10.25514/CHS.2018.2.14128



S.V. Pronichkin1,2* and I. P. Tikhonov2

1 Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

2 Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Received November 09, 2018

Published December 26, 2018

Abstract – The article is focused on developing formalizing procedure for evaluation of effectiveness of scientific research in the field of chemical and biological safety science. A series of specific aspects of the development of science research in this area in modern conditions are highlighted. A review of methods for determining the effectiveness of research and development activity is given, and the related methodological problems are discussed. The specificity of determining performance of fundamental and applied research is described. A multidimensional approach for estimating performance of scientific research activity related to the field of chemical and biological safety is proposed. The prospects for the development of new scientific methodological tools for determining performance of scientific research activities in the field of chemical and biological safety are outlined.

Keywords: scientific research performance, system analysis, expertise, criteria, chemical and biological safety, basic and applied research.


1. Fundamentals of the State Policy in the Field of Ensuring Chemical and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2015 and beyond. Approved by the Order of the President of the Russian Federation on 01.11.2013, No. Pr-2573 [in Russian].
2. Pronichkin S.V., Raevskaya E.G., Tikhonov I.P. // Him. bezop. [Electronic Journal of Chemical Safety]. 2017. V. 1. No. 2. P. 147. doi: 10.25514/CHS.2017.2.10989 [in Russian].
3. (accessed: 01.06.2018).
4. Pronichkin S.V., Tikhonov I.P. // Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ [National Interests: Priorities and Security]. 2013. No. 37. P. 13 [in Russian].
5. Pronichkin S.V., Tikhonov I.P. // Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika [Economic analysis: theory and practice] 2014. No. 3. P. 27 [in Russian].
6. Varshavskij A.E. // Obshchestvo i ekonomika. [Society and economy]. 2017. No. 6. P. 5. [in Russian].
7. Lukashov V.N., Lukashov N.V., Slepinina A.K. // Innovatsii [Innovation] 2016. No. 9. P. 55 [in Russian].
8. Mindeli L.Eh., Chernyh S.I. // Problemy prognozirovaniya [Forecasting problems]. 2016. No. 3. P. 111 [in Russian]
9. Leonov A.V., Pronin A.Yu. // Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ [National Interests: Priorities and Security]. 2017. No. 6. P. 1004 [in Russian].
10. Demiric M., Audretsch D. // Research Policy. 2017. V. 46 (9). P. 1681. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004.
11. Bryan K., Lemus J. // Journal of Economic Theory. 2017. V. 172. P. 247. doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2017.09.005.
12. Havas A., Weber K. // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. V. 115. P. 327. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.016 363.